The introduction of cloud-based (and cloud-priced) solutions have muddied the accounting waters again, such that a $4M software implementation project must be expensed if the customer is implementing a cloud application, but can be capitalized if implementing the same software on premise.

There’s an accounting answer to whether software applications – especially enterprise software applications, should be expensed or capitalized – though it seems to change from time to time. The introduction of cloud-based (and cloud-priced) solutions have muddied the accounting waters again, such that a $4M software implementation project must be expensed if the customer is implementing a cloud application, but can be capitalized if implementing the same software on premise. Personally, I’d argue that there is something wrong when you need $4M to implement a software application – though many of you that would consider the same $4M implementation expense a bargain.

I asked the question because the software that runs your business today seems to be considered a cost of doing business (i.e. expensed), where a dozen years ago we still ‘invested’ in ERP and similar systems. So what’s the difference? Back in the 1990s and early 2000s, organizations invested millions into ERP solutions to reduce the labor expense associated with processing information. The reduced work and error rates associated with ERP solutions – especially compared with manual approaches or non-integrated alternatives – drove significant savings for most businesses. The impact of this technology can be seen clearly in the productivity metrics captured by the government, and analyzed by the experts. US productivity continued to climb at increasing rates from the early 1990s (when the first integrated ERPs started to be adopted) through the early 2000s. Then productivity starts a long decline – even going negative in two of the last five years. I’ll argue that the revolutionary changes in administration and information processing related to the introduction of integrated ERP solutions was a major contributor to this productivity growth – and that the lack of any really new innovation in ERP solutions since that time has been a major contributor to the decline.

At this point, I’m ready to take on anyone who wants to argue that the enterprise application market has been a hotbed of innovation over the last decade. Cloud is a huge impact on the enterprise software marketplace just like everywhere else, but running substantially the same software on somebody else’s computer is no way to drive business productivity. And “pay-as-you-go” pricing models, as great as they are for accountants, do more for cash flow than productivity. Is any investment money going to firms dedicated to improving business productivity? A look at a current list of Unicorns (private companies valued at over $1B) shows new technologies driving disruptive business models aimed at consumers (Uber, Airbnb, Theranos, etc.), not technologies that might improve the productivity of most American businesses the way ERP did 25 years ago. University of Chicago economics professor Chad Syverson summed up the decline succinctly: “The second [productivity] wave hasn’t come yet. We have to figure out new ways to use technology and reconfigure the way other things are done.”

The second wave of productivity will arrive when we figure out how to dramatically reduce the time and effort workers spend processing information even more than the traditional ERP has. How? The next wave of ERP will leverage automation, integration, and machine learning to create a self-optimizing information processing machine that can manage the information related to the business. If we can create a car that drives itself, we can create an ERP that runs and adapts itself. A solution that did that would be worth the investment!

Share:

Related Posts

Goldilocks Memory

Written by Henry Nelson, "Cloud success comes through simpler installation and friendlier user interfaces. Customization and ensuring data privacy on multi-tenant databases are continuing challenges for the cloud."

Who is the Customer?

Written by Henry Nelson "At HarrisData, we focus on the businesses that subscribe to and use our products as our customers. One year terms provide consistent cash flow. One year terms allow annual price increases. One year terms keep us focused on satisfying our customers every day to earn the subscription renewal. They make things easy on our management. We prefer annual subscriptions".

Minus Eight and Sunny

Written by Tim Dunn There is another world; a world that has existed for over 45 years, with people that have kept perspective. It is place where the sun shines bright, offers hope, and willing share its simplicity, because it is easy to provide sunshine in the world of ERP.

Choose to be Delighted

Written by Tim Dunn Have you ever experienced Cognitive Dissonance while signing a contract? Your gut gets all tied up in knots and you wish you were somewhere else in that very moment.

Finding the Right Answer

Written by Tim Dunn There is another dimension often overlooked. Culture. Great company culture, not as defined by you and your employees but as defined by your customers, business partners, and competitors.

Focus

Written by: Tim Dunn Focus, execute, and finish. 2019 will be what we make of it, not what the rest of the world tells us it should be.

Multitenancy: Panacea and Problem

Written by: Lane Nelson We believe multitenancy creates cost advantages for ISVs like HarrisData, and intend to leverage multitenancy in whatever forms provide the most value to our customers. However, a religious commitment to multitenancy ahead of real customer requirements is just pandering to investors.

Mashup Enterprise Services

Written by Henry Nelson It is time to take a mashup approach to ERP systems. A modern ERP architecture based on enterprise services can make it happen. The use of mashups in the user interface is common for HTML based applications.

Bookmark, Link, Search

Written by: Henry Nelson Today, the HarrisData Payroll for bookmark, link, search is in beta. It will be available to you via public or private cloud soon. We are working to connect the remaining business logic to the bookmark, link, search platform and look forward to providing you the results.

Cloud Inside

Written by: Lane Nelson What does it mean to put the cloud inside the application? It means that enterprise applications need to be built to leverage what works on the cloud from the inside out. Vendors that are trying to keep up with the web are scrambling to add SOAP and REST APIs to their existing products.

Copyright HarrisData 2023©
Sitemap | Privacy | Legal | Trademarks | Sign In